The delay, preliminary speeches, thanks and gifts made it 15 minutes longer as people paraded across the stage, a badly drafted program that didn’t describe the details of teh production but did have lovely photos of every adult and child remotely connected to the production, the babies under 3 (and yes, there was some crying but it may have been me), people texting and playing video games during the production (the teenager next to me was playing a game on her tablet – no sounds but light – and her mom was on her phone texting so I didn’t think saying something to the teenager was a wise move), made it seem more like a production at the community center or church than an event downtown at the Times Union where I paid $15 just to park.
The production itself was disjointed but some of the dancing was good and some was amusing. The amusing got huge applause, as did the gospel and the West African drumming that made Claire proud of her ancestors. The ballet was not so nicely rewarded. Truly loved those plus sized dancers up there giving it their all and doing a very nice job of it. Never saw that at The Nutcracker. And as always, the children were extremely cute and some quite talented. I expected it would be a rewrite of the traditional Nutcracker but it could use an edit. If this is early 60's Harlem, for example, Hip-Hop as we know it today didn't really belong in Claire's dream. The snakes were ... interesting. I'd have thought nightmares of rats might have been more appropriate but the dancing was fine. The music was taped and that wasn't a surprise (it was the same at the Florida Theatre Nutcracker when I attended) but at one point it sounded like an old scratchy record. I suppose that could have been on purpose but I could have done without that. I had high hopes and overall I was disappointed.